The NLL expert network on validation has carried out the MC investigation project within the following overall focal points:
Context, formats and target groups
We are mapping the formats in which MCs are available, when looking at a match of target groups and contexts i.e. work life, education and training, learning – formal and non-formal – and possibly contexts in combinations.
Legitimacy, credibility and recognition
We are concerned with the investigation issues of legitimacy, trust and the application of MCs with a view to assessing transparency, coherence and the involvement of cross-cutting collaboration in the development and supply of MCs, as well as whether the identified MCs enjoy wider recognition across sectors, actors and stakeholders in a national context.
Validation and recognition
We are interested in exploring the ways in which validation is included as an element of the MC format, with the possibility that (a) an assessment can be made against the learning objectives for formal education, applying existing legislation and practice, and hence the possibility to stack MCs – cf. the principle of Stackability, e.g. for part of a full Qualification (a). Or (b) as validation of a person’s prior learning, which, potentially, results in a MC and hence, with recognition in the company, the industry, the sector or generally in work life, which ensures the holder of a given MC that this can be applied in the industries in question (subsectors). One question in relation to (b) that needs to be investigated in more details is, how this recognition – in the framework of work life, either industry or sector-specific – is ensured legitimacy. Is there a system for this recognition? Or does it depend on other mechanisms that can be attributed to validity within a given domain?